San Mateo County Genealogical Society's Blog featuring society events, projects, meeting notes and other items of relevance to genealogists.
Showing posts with label Criminal Case Files. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Criminal Case Files. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Barry's Bits & Sharing Stories

culled from the San Francisco Examiner by Barry Goyette 

Impetuous Women



Sharing Stories
May 20, 10:30 am - 1 pm
Grace Lutheran Church, 2825 Alameda de las Pulgas, San Mateo.

The May 20 monthly meeting is the celebration of our Sharing Stories event. Join the fun and write a family history or local San Mateo County story and submit it by April 30 to smcgs.org.

The meeting will be full of excitement from reading aloud selected stories, to giving everyone who submitted a story a small gift, to the drawing for three $25 cash prizes from all stories submitted, and an extra drawing for three SMCGS tote bags from stories that mention San Mateo County. The meeting wraps up with a Pot Luck lunch for time to discuss our stories with fellow attendees. 

Everyone is welcome to attend. If you submitted a story, be sure to come so that you may receive your small thank you gift. 

See you there!




Wednesday, January 4, 2017

NARA: Criminal Case Files 3




The Case of the Chapman Pirates
Martha Wallace

The Cyane (left) loomed over the 
J M Chapman (right) after capturing 
it in March 1863.
Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, 
May 9, 1863

Criminal Cases US Circuit Court 1863-1917    

Box 1, Cases 7 & 8. United States v Ridgley Greathouse, et al.
Box 1, Cases 7 & 8. United States v the schooner J M Chapman, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, cargo, arms, and ammunition; Paul Shirley, commander of the USS Cyane, the officers and crew.

During the Civil War, gold from California was an important resource for the Union, helping to fund the war. Ulysses S. Grant once said on the topic of California’s support to the war effort, “I do not know what we would do in this great national emergency if it were not for the gold sent from California.” 

The Big Plan
In 1862 a group of Confederate sympathizers put together a plan to arm a schooner and lie outside the Golden Gate and along the Pacific Coast down to Manzanillo, Mexico, and capture ships filled with gold and silver headed to the east coast (there were still a lot of gold shipments at this time). The captured ships would be used as privateers with a commission from the Confederate government. The gold and silver would be used to purchase arms for the captured ships as well as for sending money to the Confederacy. Then they would have California secede from the Union and join the Confederacy. The leaders were Ridgeley Greathouse, Asbury Harpending, and Alfred Rubery.

Asbury Harpending visited Confederate President Jefferson Davis in Richmond and received a letter of marque, a government license authorizing the fitting out of an armed ship to use to capture enemy ships.

Ridgley Greathouse was the one with the money. He was a wealthy banker who had been involved in northern California mining and stage lines.

They gathered other southern sympathizers, many of them members of the Knights of the Golden Circle, a secret society working to undermine Union military efforts to defeat the South.

Daily Alta California, Volume 15, 
Number 4764, 
11 March 1863
They purchased a fast 90-ton clipper schooner, the J M Chapman, for $6500 and outfitted it with arms (two 12-pound-shot cannons, rifles, pistols, gunpowder, and other equipment of war). The ship was advertised to sail from Jackson Wharf in San Francisco on March 9, 1863. 

There were 22 men involved in this case:
Ridgeley Greathouse, Asbury Harpending, Alfred Rubery, William C. Law, Lorenzo L. Libby, James Smith, John W. McFadden, William D. Ward, John E. Kent, John Fletcher, Thomas W. Brunds, William W. Mason, George W. Davis, Albion T. Crow, Madison H. Marshall, Thomas Poole, Alfred Aumond, Henry C. Boyd, Joseph W. Smith, Richard H. Duval, Gideon C. Jones and Joseph G. Baldwin Junior.

Betrayal
Someone warned the authorities. On March 14, 1863, they were ready to sail out of San Francisco, but they kept waiting for the captain/navigator, William Law, to return to the ship. He may have been out getting drunk or he may have been talking to the authorities; or they may have been planning to sail at daybreak. Some sources name Captain W. E. Travers of the Hornet, as the informant. The crew of the J M Chapman went to sleep on board the ship.

The Journal of San Diego History
April 1961
At dawn, on March 15, the US Naval ship, USS Cyane and a police tug came alongside with cannons trained on the Chapman. The Cyane crew boarded the Chapman and arrested everyone.

The 22 men were imprisoned on Alcatraz Island in Fort Alcatraz, and set for trial, accused of treason. The fort began functioning as a military prison in 1861 and in 1863 it was used to hold private citizens accused of treason.



The Trial
The trial began on October 2, 1863. The indictment was for “assisting, aiding and comforting the existing Rebellion against the United States.”

Greathouse, Harpending, and Rubery were found guilty of giving aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States and sentenced to ten years in prison and a fine of $10,000.

Daily Alta California, 9 Sep 1863
In December 1863 President Lincoln announced a general pardon: anyone who had worked against the Union and then signed a loyalty oath could be released. The other members of the crew were freed after swearing an oath of loyalty to the Union. Greathouse, Harpending, and Rubery were released in February 1864 after signing the oath. Their stories after the war are also interesting.                                                

Results: The opinions rendered in this trial by Judge Ogden Hoffman, Jr., set a precedent for defining piracy and treason until World War II.1, 2  The questions addressed were:

Were the men traitors or enemies? The men on the Chapman were tried as traitors not as enemies, because they lived in a state that was in the United States, not in a state that was in the Confederacy. If the Confederate States had been a foreign and independent nation with whom the US was at war, the crime would still have been considered treason.

Was their plan a pirate expedition? Did the Confederate letters of marque affect their status as pirates, traitors, or enemies? When a civil war exists, hostilities committed by vessels under a letter of marque are not an act of piracy.

Who was entitled to prize money (money from the sale of the ship)?
• The J M Chapman was sold as a war prize for $7,000. The money was divided between the United States and the informer, Captain E. W. Travers.
• The members of the crew of the J M Chapman were allowed one month's salary as they were judged innocent of all charges.
• The crew of the USS Cyane, the US warship involved in the capture, sued the US government for the prize money resulting from the sale of the Chapman. Prize money was due to naval crews when a pirate ship was captured. If the Chapman was declared a pirate ship, that meant that the Confederacy was recognized as a separate nation. If the Chapman was a US ship, the crew were guilty of treason and no prize money was due to the Cyane crew.

Later Stories

Asbury Harpending, 
taken during his active career
 in San Francisco. 
Asbury Harpending - Born in Kentucky, his previous adventures included joining a filibuster in Nicaragua, mining in California and Mexico, and joining a conspiracy to create a “Pacific Republic” in California. After the Civil War he got into mining, real estate, and railroads. He was one of the financiers of the Great Diamond Hoax of 1872, along with others such as Horace Greeley, William C Ralston, Baron von Rothschild, and Charles Tiffany. This involved salting land in Wyoming and Colorado with diamonds and was one of the greatest swindles of the time. Asbury Harpending wrote his autobiography in 1913, The Great Diamond Hoax. You can read his version of the whole incident in his own words. It is a rollicking read!3

Marysville Daily Appeal, 
Number 83, 8 April 1864
Ridgely Greathouse - Born in Kentucky, he had come to California where he became a banker and gold miner, owning property in Yreka, Scott Valley, and Shasta Valley. He was the city treasurer in Yreka and operated a canal company and an express and passenger service between Shasta County and Jacksonville, Oregon.  He was rearrested in 1864 for breaking the parole and oath of allegiance he had signed 1861 and 1862 when leaving Kentucky. He was then sent east to Lafayette prison in New York harbor, where he escaped by bribing a guard to bring him a saw to saw through the bars of his window. He swam to shore, walked ten miles to Williamsburg, and crossed over into New York. From there he went to Canada, England, and Mexico, returning to the US under a general amnesty, perhaps to mining in Idaho. He was driving cattle from Texas to Idaho but had to sell the herd in Kansas. He then worked on a ranch near Matador, Texas, until his death.      
    
Alfred Rubery, nephew? of John Bright,
the great British statesman.
Alfred Rubery was born in England, so Lincoln’s amnesty did not cover him. He received a special pardon through the help of John Bright, British Member of Parliament, who appealed to Lincoln. John Bright wanted the man pardoned, and England's friendship was vital; Rubery was pardoned.4
  
Santa Cruz Public Library

  
A crew member who was freed, Tom Poole, came from Loma Prieta in Santa Cruz County. He had been undersheriff of Monterey County. Those areas were hotbeds of Southern sympathy. Tom Poole was finally hung in 1865 in Placerville in the gold country after being involved in a shoot-out at an inn with a posse chasing a bunch of gold robbers – he was one of them – and they were going to send the money to the Confederacy. Another interesting story! 

Another crew member who was freed, John McFadden, in 1864 was sentenced to five years' imprisonment in the State Prison for highway robbery.
 
Footnotes
  1. The Opinon in Case No. 2,602. The CHAPMAN {4Sawy. 501.} District Court, NorthernDistrict California. Jan. 13, 1864.  (LawResource.org) 
  2.  “Treason,” by Henry Mark Holzer, 19 Sep 2005. Article delineating the importance of the Greathouse case in defining treason. (Discoverthenetworks.org)  
  3. The Great Diamond Hoax  Chapter 8  Chapter 9 by Asbury Harpending (BooksaboutCalifornia.com) 
  4. "Diplomat In Carpet Slippers Abraham Lincoln Deals With Foreign Affairs" by Jay Monahan (Internet Archive)

 Some Online Summaries

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

NARA: Criminal Case Files 2

Part II  Civil Rights
By Martha Wallace and Cath Trindle




The violation of an individual's civil rights is one of the crimes tried in US Federal Court.  Among the cases heard in San Francisco in the late 1800s are those of John Jackson, tax collector for Trinity County, and Thomas Stapleton (Thomas Breeze) tax collector for El Dorado County.  The indictments were for demanding, exacting, and collecting a Foreign Miners Tax of $4 


Sacramento Transcript, 
Volume 2, Number 132
29 March 1851
In 1850 the first California state legislature passed the first Foreign Miners Tax Law, levying a twenty dollars per month tax on each foreigner engaged in mining. A revolt resulted and it was repealed in 1851. The Foreign Miners Tax Law was reenacted in 1852. By 1853 the Foreign Miner's Tax stated in Section 6, "The amount to be paid for each license shall be at the rate of four dollars per month, and said license shall in no case be transferable."  

Collections of the tax in 1850 amounted to more than $26,000 and between 1850 and 1870 provided more than 1/2 of the tax revenue for the state. Controversy over the tax was immediate. The Daily Alta California article, "Murders & Robberies", claims that the law caused an increase in crime in the gold country.  In fact, the tax was rigidly enforced against Mexicans and Chileans to encourage them to leave the gold region which in some cases prompted revenge.

By the 1870s the law was mainly enforced against the Chinese miners. The case against Sheriff John Jackson was instigated by the complaint of Ah Koo, who also claimed to be a citizen.

Sheriff John Jackson was found guilty. However, as the The Daily Alta California reported in  The Sentence of Sheriff Jackson on 26 Mar 1871 the judge, stating that although he was guilty he was acting under the color of the law,  only fined him $20. He also implied that the case could be immediately appealed to a higher court so the legality of the law could be determined.
 
In the second case, the complainants claimed they should not have pay this tax, as the tax was not collected from white miners (implying white "foreign" miners.) On 15 Dec 1873 the case was ordered nolle prosequi (will no longer prosecute.)

__________________________________________________

Daily Alta California, Volume 28, 

Number 9420, 20 January 1876  

Just a few years later in 1876 another set of civil rights cases was heard.  Both cases were against Thomas Maguire, the proprietor of a San Francisco theater.

Charles Green and George M Taylor and purchased theater tickets bur were not allowed to enter the theater and be seated in the seats they had purchased.  They claimed this was a violation of their civil rights.

The case of Charles Green was heard and a jury determined that Maguire was not guilty.  The judge in this case had excluded testimony that the doorkeeper had acted on orders of Maguire. The jury therefore found that the doorkeeper had acted on his own authority and therefore Maguire was not responsible.

The case of George M Taylor was ordered nolle prosequi on 16 Jul 1877.  The book  Children of Fire: A History of African Americans by Thomas C. Holt discusses how the second case involving George Taylor helped to gut the Civil Rights Act of 1875.




Links



Wednesday, November 16, 2016

NARA: Criminal Case Files 1863-1917

Part I  
By Martha Wallace and Cath Trindle

When does a criminal case end up in Federal Court rather than a state court?  The answer is definitely not that it was more serious.  In fact a great number of the cases found in this record set are for such weighty crimes as not paying taxes on the sale of friction matches, not having a liquor license, or cutting trees on federal land for personal gain. The criteria for ending up in Federal Court is that the crime violated a federal law, therefore we find tax cases,  civil rights cases, admiralty cases and the like.

Take for example the selling of those friction matches without a tax stamp.  By the 1870's the friction matches that were manufactured in the United States were most often the type referred to as drunkard's matches, an improvement on parlor matches. Parlor matches combined white phosphorous, paraffin among other ingredients on wooden sticks that were generally left attached at the bottom.  Drunkard's matches were created when the bottom of the match was dipped in a non-flammable substance. An 1877 article in Popular Mechanics, Matches, by John A Garver A.B. describes the manufacture of matches in depth.

A tax on the sale of friction matches had been imposed by the Internal Revenue Act of 1864 (Sec 168) and amended in 1866.  (repealed by the Tarriff Act of 1883). The law required that a stamp be placed on each packet of matches that sold.  The cost was $1 for packages of up to 100 matches, and an additional $1 for each 100 matches or portion thereof.  There were generic stamps that could be used by anyone, and also proprietary stamps that were used by individual companies.  To put this tax into perspective, just those matches exported in 1879 brought in nearly $380,000 in tax revenue.  The article mentioned above also discusses the stamp tax and the effect it had on match manufacturing in the United States.



In November of 1877 James Schyler of Half Moon Bay was charged with possession of twelve (12) packages of matches for which the tax had not been paid. Half a year later the charges were dismissed against not only Schyler but against a number of others charged with the same crime.  But not everyone was so lucky.  William Olden, who had been manufacturing the matches, was sentenced to a fine of $500 or 30 days in the Alameda County Jail.  Those who pled guilty for the most part received a $100 fine or between 1 and 6 months in jail.  Some went to trial and were found not guilty, others found guilty received sentences similar to those who pled guilty.

________________________________

In 1887 there were a number of indictments surrounding fraudulent public land surveys, against those who benefited by the surveys and those who swore to their authenticity. Towards the end of this record set there are a number of murders at sea with varying decisions and punishments.

With over 2000 case files, in 63 boxes and two docket books, this database just might provide some color for your family history.  Watch the SMCGS Blog for more on the Federal Criminal Court records at NARA.


Links